рус eng
«IZVESTIYA IRKUTSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA». SERIYA «NAUKI O ZEMLE»
«THE BULLETIN OF IRKUTSK STATE UNIVERSITY». SERIES «EARTH SCIENCES»
ISSN 2073-3402 (Print)

List of issues > Series «Earth Sciences». 2025. Vol 53

Оценка рекреационных экосистемных услуг муниципального района для целей управления природопользованием

Author(s)

A. E. Nazarenko1, B. A. Krasnoyarova1 

1 Institute for Water and Environmental Problems SB RAS, Barnaul, Russian Federation

Abstract
The study assessed the recreational ecosystem services of the Zarinsky region of the Altai Krai, determined by the presence in the region of natural conditions for recreation, including tourism. The assessment is based on the application of the hedonic pricing method, as the initial data for its implementation were data on the cadastral value of recreational land plots, as well as data on the cadastral value of neighboring agricultural and forestry plots, the land use structure of the area, data from the Forest Plan of the Altai Krai. In the course of the study, the main objects of organized and unorganized recreation in the region were considered, in total, an analysis of 7 objects and 33 land plots was carried out. On the basis of a comparative analysis, recreational ecosystem services were assessed in four settlements where tourist bases and recreation centers operate. The value of recreational ecosystem services in the area according to the results of the study is 18855–23954 rubles/ha/year. It was revealed that the location of objects of organized and unorganized recreation in the Zarinsky region tends to transport infrastructure, as well as to objects that are attractive for tourism – slopes suitable for active types of tourism, water bodies, taiga landscapes. It was also revealed that when moving from west to east across the territory of the region, the change of landscapes from forest-steppe plains to taiga foothills causes an increase in the value of recreational services. In addition, within the framework of the study, proposals were developed for the development of organized tourism in water bodies popular with the population, which will increase the quality and value of recreational ecosystem services.
About the Authors

Nazarenko Anton Evgenievich, Candidate of Sciences (Geography), Junior Research Scientist. Institute for Water and Environmental Problems SB RAS 1, Molodezhnaya st., Barnaul, 656038, Russian Federation e-mail: harret1992@mail.ru

Krasnoyarova Bella Aleksandrovna, Doctor of Sciences (Geography), Professor, Chief Research Scientist. Institute for Water and Environmental Problems SB RAS 1, Molodezhnaya st., Barnaul, 656038, Russian Federation e-mail: bella@iwep.ru

For citation
Nazarenko A.E., Krasnoyarova B.A. Recreational Ecosystem Services Assessment in a Municipal Region for Nature Management. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Earth Sciences, 2025, vol. 53, pp. 97-111. https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3402.2025.53.97 (in Russian)
Keywords
ecosystem services, environmental management, land use structure, municipal region, tourism.
UDC
502.35(5)(571.150)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3402.2025.53.97
References
  1. Tsimbalei Yu.M. Landshaftnaya karta Altaiskogo kraya. Masshtab 1:500000 [Landscape map of the Altai Krai. Scale 1:500000. Barnaul, IWEP SB RAS Publ., 2016. (in Russian) 
  2. Materialy kompleksnogo ekologicheskogo obsledovaniya uchastkov territorii, obosnovyvayushchie pridanie etoi territorii pravovogo statusa osobo okhranyaemoi prirodnoi territorii federalnogo znacheniya – Natsionalnyi park “Salair” v Altaiskom krae [Materials of a comprehensive environmental survey of areas of the territory, substantiating the assignment of this territory the legal status of a specially protected natural area of federal significance – the Salair National Park in the Altai Krai]. Barnaul, 2019, 344 p. (in Russian) 
  3. Mekush G.E., Ushakova E.O. Otsenka tsennosti ekosistemnykh uslug dlya razvitiya rekreatsii i turizma [Assessing the value of ecosystem services for the development of recreation and tourism]. Vestnik SGUGiT (Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta geosistem i tekhnologii) [Bulletin of SSUGiT (Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies)], 2016, vol. 1 (33), pp. 200- 209. (in Russian) 
  4. Nazarenko A.E. Modelirovanie posledstvii transformatsii struktury zemlepolzovaniya s ispolzovaniem otsenok ekosistemnykh uslug [Modeling the consequences of land use transformation using ecosystem service valuations]. Geograficheskii vestnik [Geographical Bulletin], 2021, vol. 1 (56), pp. 173-186. (in Russian) 
  5. Nazarenko A.E., Krasnoyarova B.A. Otsenka potentsiala obespechivayushchikh ekosistemnykh uslug munitsipalnykh raionov Altaiskogo kraya [Assessment of the potential of providing ecosystem services of municipal regions of the Altai Krai]. Vestnik Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Altai State Agrarian University], 2018, vol. 3 (161), pp. 42-50. (in Russian) 
  6. Klimanova O.A., Bukvareva E.N., Illarionova O.A., Kolbovskii E.Yu. Otsenka ekosistemnykh uslug na munitsipalnom urovne i ee vozmozhnaya integratsiya v territorialnoe planirovanie [Valuation of ecosystem services at the municipal level and its possible integration into territorial planning]. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya [News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Geographical Series], 2022, vol. 4, pp. 605-620. (in Russian) 
  7. Rozenberg A.G. Otsenki ekosistemnykh uslug dlya territorii Samarskoi oblasti [Assessment of ecosystem services for the territory of the Samara region]. Povolzhskii ekologicheskii zhurnal [Volga Region Ecological Journal], 2014, vol. 1, pp. 139-145. (in Russian) 
  8. Kudinova G.E., Rozenberg A.G., Kostina N.V. et al. Stoimostnaya otsenka ekosistemnykh uslug pri obespechenii ustoichivogo razvitiya regiona (na primere Samarskoi oblasti) [Valuation of ecosystem services in ensuring sustainable development of the region (using the example of the Samara region)]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Samara State University of Economics], 2015, vol. 8, pp. 17-23. (in Russian) 
  9. Tikhonova T.V. Otsenka effektivnosti napravlenii razvitiya osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii Respubliki Komi [Evaluation of the effectiveness of development directions of specially protected natural areas of the Komi Republic]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast], 2015, vol. 1 (37), pp. 182- 195. (in Russian) 
  10. Fomenko G.A., Fomenko M.A., Mikhailova A.V., Mikhailova T.R. Ekonomicheskaya otsenka osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii Kamchatki: Prakticheskie rezultaty i ikh znachenie dlya sokhraneniya bioraznoobraziya (na primere prirodnogo parka “Bystritskii”) [Economic evaluation of the specific natural resources of Kamchatka: practical results and their implications for the preservation of biodiversity (based on the Bystritskii Nature Park)]. Sokhranenie bioraznoobraziya Kamchatki i prilegayushchikh morei [Preservation of biodiversity of Kamchatka and adjacent seas], 2010, pp. 361. (in Russian) 
  11. Ekosistemnye uslugi Rossii: Prototip natsionalnogo doklada. T.1. Uslugi nazemnykh ekosistem: red. E.N. Bukvareva, D.G. Zamolodchikov. [Ecosystem services of Russia: Prototype of the national report, vol. 1. Services of terrestrial ecosystems: ed. E. N. Bukvareva, D. G. Zamolodchikov.], Moscow, Publ. Wildlife Conservation Center, 2016, 148 p. (in Russian) 
  12. Koschke L., Fürst C., Frank S., Makeschin F. A multi-criteria approach for an integrated landcover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators, 2012, vol. 21, pp. 54-66. 
  13. Basnou C., Baró F., Langemeyer J. et al. Advancing the green infrastructure approach in the Province of Barcelona: integrating biodiversity, ecosystem functions and services into landscape planning. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2020, vol. 55. 
  14. Albert C., Galler C., Hermes J. et al. Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: The ESin-Planning framework. Ecological Indicators, 2016, vol. 61, pp. 100-113. 
  15. Hermes J., Van Berkel D., Burkhard B. et al. Assessment and valuation of recreational ecosystem services of landscapes. Ecosystem services, 2018, vol. 31, pp. 289-295. 
  16. Bastian O., Haase D., Grunewald K. Ecosystem properties, potentials and services. The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecological Indicators, 2012, vol. 21, pp. 7-16. 
  17. Costanza R., De Groot R., Sutton P. et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 2014, vol. 26, pp. 152-158. 
  18. Simoncini R., Ring I., Sandström C. et al. Constraints and opportunities for mainstreaming biodiversity and ecosystem services in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy: Insights from the IPBES assessment for Europe and Central Asia. Land Use Policy, 2019, vol. 88. 
  19. Costanza R., Daly H.E. Natural Capital and Sustainable Development. Conservation biology, 1992, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 37-46. 
  20. García-Díez V., García-Llorente M., González J.A. Participatory Mapping of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Madrid: Insights for Landscape Planning. Land, 2020, vol. 9, pp. 244-262. 
  21. Kulczyk S., Woźniak E., Derek M. Landscape, facilities and visitors: An integrated model of recreational ecosystem services. Ecosystem services, 2018, vol. 31, pp. 491-501. 
  22. Yurak V.V. The guidelines for economic valuation of ecosystem services in region. News of the Ural State Mining University, 2016, vol. 42, pp. 86-90. 



Full text (russian)