The article discusses the current practice of using certain geoinformation in the development of territories, describes the most relevant areas of use of spatial data, the qualitative content of such data. For these purposes, the author gives a technological characteristic of the procedure for consolidating the most popular information of the above type in the specialized state registers maintained in the Russian Federation and containing an official spatial description of immovable things. The paper analyzes the conceptual and organizational problems of maintaining appropriate registers. Through the analysis of these problems, it is concluded that there is a lack of quality of specialized spatial data, the presence of which generates negative consequences for the territories for which these data are obtained. The positive effects arising in the absence of the above-mentioned problem of information quality in relation to the Russian economic and legal reality are analyzed. Based on the obtained conclusions, the author puts forward the thesis that the correct description of real estate objects by means of economically determined and (or) legally significant spatial data has a number of positive effects, which are expressed in the intensification of territorial development processes. The study consists of six parts. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, which contains the main conclusion of the author, the work has four sections. The first section provides the technical information necessary for the disclosure of the topic of the article, while the second focuses on complex problems caused by technical problems. The third section contains an economic analysis of the consequences of technical problems that were studied earlier. The fourth section provides specific examples of such consequences, studied by the author.

Stepanov Konstantin Gennadievich, Postgraduate, V. B. Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS, 1, Ulan-Batorskaya st., Irkutsk, 664033, Russian Federation; Head of Property Management Department Irkutsk Scientific Center SB RAS, 134, Lermontov st., Irkutsk, 664033, Russian Federation, e-mail: skg@isc.irk.ru

Stepanov K.G. On the Role of Spatial Data of the Real Estate Cadaster in the Complex Development of Territories. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Earth Sciences, 2020, vol. 34, pp. 113–130. https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3402.2020.34.113 (in Russian)

Karbainov N.I. Problema prav sobstvennosti v rabotakh Ernando de Soto: kriticheskiy obzor [The Problem of Property Rights in the Works of Hernando de Soto: Critical Review]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 2017, no. 20(1), pp. 181-190. https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2017.20.1.11. (in Russian)

Karpik A.P., Fedorenko Yu.V., Parkhomenko D.V. O roli geoinformatsii v reshenii grazhdansko-pravovykh problem na osnove Edinogo gosudarstvennogo reestra nedvizhimosti (na materialakh Irkutskoi oblasti) [About the role of geoinformation in solving civil law problems based on the Unified state register of real estate (based on the materials of the Irkutsk region)]. Vestnik SGUGiT [Bulletin SSGA], 2017, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 154-170. (in Russian)

Kutepov A.V. Neobkhodimo razrabotat kontseptsiyu ucheta vsekh informatsionnykh sistem o zemle [A concept for accounting for all land information systems should be developed]. Available at: http://council.gov.ru/events/news/108967/?fbclid=IwAR1uIBRH61N9YDwnA5 uIo1efc_PGQctJvYL6JmBh_J9t9YwT-gKv7KImMTc (date of access: 06.12.2019). (in Russian)

Prostranstvennye dannye: potrebnosti ekonomiki v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii [Spatial data: economic needs in the context of digitalization]. NIU VShE; NII “Aerokosmos”. Moscow, NIU VShE Publ., 2020, 128 p. (in Russian)

Rogova M.V. Mezhmunitsipalnaya differentsiatsiya intensivnosti zemel'nogo oborota Baikal'skogo regiona [Intermunicipal Differentiation of the Intensity of Land Turnover in the Baikal Region]. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Nauki o Zemle [The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Earth Sciences], 2019, vol. 28, pp. 108-119. https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3402.2019.28.108. (in Russian)

Sinenko V.A. Klassifikatsiya vyyavlennykh oshibok v svedeniyakh Edinogo gosudarstvennogo reestra nedvizhimosti pri verifikatsii dannykh [Classification of errors in details Single roster of real estate in verification of data]. Byulleten nauki i praktiki [Bulletin of Science and Practice], 2018, vol. 4 (10), pp. 384-390. (in Russian). 

Soto E. de. Zagadka kapitala. Pochemu kapitalizm torzhestvuet na Zapade i terpit porazhenie vo vsem ostal'nom mire [The Mystery of Capital. Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else]. Moscow, Olymp-Business Publ., 2004, 272 p. (in Russian) 

Stepanov K.G. Ogranichennost' ob»ema svedenii kadastrovogo ucheta kak destruktivnyi faktor razvitiya territorii osobogo gradostroitel'nogo regulirovaniya (na primere territorii Akademgorodka g. Irkutska) [Limited amount of cadastral data as a destructive factor in the development of territories of special urban planning regulation (on the example of the territory of Akademgorodok, Irkutsk)]. Problemy gosudarstvennoi registratsii nedvizhimosti i kadastrovogo ucheta [Problems of state registration of real estate and cadastral registration: materials of the V scientific-practical conference (Irkutsk, December 3, 2019)]. Irkutsk, 2020, pp. 55-60. (in Russian). 

Tikhonova K.V., Kochetova E.V., Kochetov S.S. Analiz problem informatsionnoi napolnennosti uchetno-registratsionnoi sistemy i ee rol v razlichnykh apparatakh upravleniya [Analysis information problem content in accounting and registration system and its role in various control devices]. Ekonomika i ekologiya territorial'nykh obrazovanii [Economy and ecology of territorial formations], 2018, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 34-44. https://doi.org/10.23947/2413-1474-2018-2-4-34-44. (in Russian)

Rahmatizadeh S., Rajabifard A., Kalantari M., Ho S. A framework for selecting a fit-for-purpose data collection method in land administration. Land use policy, 2018, vol. 70, pp. 162-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.034.

Collins A., Mitchell M.I. Revisiting the World Bank’s land law reform agenda in Africa: The promise and perils of customary practices. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2018, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 112-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12201.

Goldstein M., Houngbedji K., Kondylis F., O'Sullivan M., Selod H. Formalization without certification? Experimental evidence on property rights and investment. Journal of Development Economics, 2018, vol. 132, pp. 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2017.12.008. 

Kalabamu F.T. Land tenure reforms and persistence of land conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa – The case of Botswana. Land use policy, 2019, vol. 81, pp. 337-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.002

Lambrecht I., Asare S. The complexity of local tenure systems: A smallholders’ perspective on tenure in Ghana. Land use policy, 2016, vol. 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.029. 

Polat Z.A., Alkan M., Sürmeneli H.G. Determining strategies for the cadastre 2034 vision using an AHP-Based SWOT analysis: A case study for the turkish cadastral and land administration system. Land use policy, 2017, vol. 67, pp. 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.004

Hendriks B., Zevenbergen J., Bennett R., Antonio D. Pro-poor land administration: Towards practical, coordinated, and scalable recording systems for all. Land use policy, 2019, vol. 81, ppp. 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.033

Soto H. de. The other path: The invisible revolution in the Third world. New York, Harper & Row, Cop., 1989, 271 p.

Soto H. De. The Mystery of Capital. Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. New York, Basic Books, 2000, 206 p.

Lawry S., Samii C., Hall R., Leopold A., Hornby D., Mtero F. The impact of land property rights interventions on investment and agricultural productivity in developing countries: a systematic review. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 2017, vol. 9, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2016.1160947

Zevenbergen J. Systems of Land Registration. Delf, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, 2002, 223 p.

Zevenbergen J. A systems approach to land registration and cadaster. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 2004, vol. 1, pp. 11-24.